A federal appellate court declined to stay a lower court’s rulings in a case challenging the Trump administration’s authority to deport Venezuelan nationals under a 1798 wartime statute. 

A three-judge panel’s 2-1 decision in favor of the plaintiffs in the case further halted the Trump administration’s deportation agenda.

Judges Karen Henderson, Patricia Millett, and Justin Walker of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed last week to hear the case expeditiously, and they heard oral arguments on Monday.

On Monday, Millett, an Obama appointee, sided with the plaintiffs and argued back and forth. She discussed with Justice Department lawyer Drew Ensign whether the Trump administration had violated constitutional due process rights by potentially denying deportees enough time to seek habeas protections and how the administration was enforcing the applicable law.

The Trump administration is almost certain to file an appeal.

A legal analyst stated during the CNN panel discussion that Democrats might be doomed if this case reached the U.S. Supreme Court.

“This has been an unprecedented case from the beginning,” stated Xochitl Hinojosa, a former director of Public Affairs at the DOJ. In actuality, the D.C. circuit is rendering a decision on a highly technical issue. The Alien Enemies Act is not up for a decision. In fact, they are making a decision regarding the dispute between Judge Boasberg and the Department of Justice. An 18th-century statute was used by the administration, the Department of Justice, and justice.

In essence, the judge gave a tro, said, “I need some more information on this,” and told them to wait a minute. It’s been a while since this was used. Please provide me with more details. After the Justice Department refused to cooperate, they filed this appeal, which is currently pending before the D.C. Circuit. It is therefore highly process-oriented. Generally speaking, I would say that the Justice Department would not succeed. There is obviously a lot of politics at play here, and it’s unclear where that final judge will rule, she continued, “but considering how everything in this matter has been unprecedented, from the calling to impeach the judge to everyone from their Department of Justice leadership, signing on to these filings, which never happens.”

And then, it truly could all boil down to that. Of course, Mark, if Trump prevails, that would be a victory in this particular sense, depending on how things turn out. Overall, no. I mean, it’s his wager. “Is Mark hoping that this will all end up in the Supreme Court?” host Erin Burnett questioned.

That’s the intended destination. With little judicial oversight, the Trump administration seeks to increase its authority and capacity to carry out deportations. And that’s where it is,” Axios senior reporter Marc Caputo stated.

The Trump administration thinks that the law is on their side and that the Supreme Court’s makeup ultimately supports them. In other words, there are more Republican-appointed Justices than Democratic-appointed ones. And those two elements are basically the game for them,” Caputo continued.

Attorney General Pam Bondi harshly chastised lower court judges for interfering in immigration matters in an interview with Fox News. If necessary, she also pledged to take the case to the Supreme Court for review.

Regarding the rulings from the lower courts, Bondi remarked, “This is an out-of-control judge, a federal judge, trying to control our entire foreign policy, and he cannot do it.”